Election day frequently coincides with my birthday, November 5. Voting was an important event for Dad and Mom, a civic duty. Mom dressed nicely, because who knows which townspeople she would see at the elementary school, the Old El, where votes were cast. Visiting was in order on voting day.
Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal had given Dad self-respect at a very tough time, when he was a young father with no job. My parents liked old down-to-earth Harry Truman, too (as president he bought his own stamps for personal letters), but I wonder if/when they switched to voting for Eisenhower. They didn't say whether they were Democrats or Republicans. They liked Eisenhower just fine. And Mamie, and her funny bangs. The Eisenhowers were the first couple of my childhood. The old General presided over post-war peace and prosperity and it was fine with all of us.
The walls of my Old El second-grade classroom, across the hall from the activity room where townspeople voted, were festooned with a big American flag and framed pictures of George Washington and Abraham Lincoln. We pledged allegiance to that flag, and we filled out a little flow chart of the branches of government, checks and balances and all that. We made an organizational chart showing the president and his cabinet members. Ezra Taft Benson, well-known to Mormons, had been appointed Eisenhower's secretary of agriculture in 1953, which undoubtedly solidified Mormon allegiance. It seemed appropriate that Benson was secretary of agriculture. Agriculture was important to Utah.
(Today, the recent film "King Corn" tells us just how crazy U.S. agriculture and food production have become. Obesity, food safety, antibiotic resistance, overuse of pesticides, ecosystem degradation, farm subsidies--it's all of a piece. We need a really good new secretary of agriculture.)
The current two-year political campaign has its craziness and ugliness, as well as its historical and critical significance. I think Dad would be intrigued with Barack Obama. He would respect his humble beginnings and his achievement, his equanimity and poise. Obama might remind my family in some ways of the drive and sunny groundedness of Warren Woolsey, raised next door to us by a single mom, who sometimes was a recipient of "commodity" cheese from welfare. Warren stepped out on the back porch each morning to brush his teeth. He was always well-groomed, he was a basketball player, custodian of the seminary, an Eagle scout, valedictorian of the high school. He went on a mission to Australia, became a dentist and a marathoner, and is now in Africa doing humanitarian work.
Dad liked Warren, and sent him a little money when he was on his mission. Dad might have sent Obama a little money, too. I can imagine him saying, "Old McCain is too old." My mother would like the pictures of Obama with the babies, and the photo of him talking on the telephone with his feet up, the photo in which you can see the holes in the soles of Obama's shoes. She would laugh and say, "Those shoes have been resoled once." She knew about resoled shoes.
It would not have been lost on Dad (who made $30 a month working in the CCC camps, under Franklin Roosevelt) and Mom (who helped Dad paint national forest signs) that McCain sneered about about "spreading the wealth around," while his wife Cindy, a beer-distribution heiress and old rodeo queen, stands beside him, worth $100 million, wearing thousands, with seven plus houses, a dozen automobiles and an airplane. Dad eventually retired from a civil service job, a job he did honorably, and faithfully, and proudly, for the U.S. government. During my childhood we had health clinics, welfare for those who needed it, and county and state hospitals for the down-on-their-luck and indigent. The Mormons are known for taking care of their own, but the government did its part, too.
Because of VietNam, I wasn't crazy about Lyndon Johnson (although I liked Lady Bird, and can highly recommend the Johnson library in Austin), but the presidents I've taken a shine to have all been Democrats. I remember the excitement of John Kennedy, and his speech about "ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country." I was a freshman in college when he was assassinated. Joanie called Dad in a panic, and he assured her that everything would be okay.
Nixon was sinister, maladjusted, and the Watergate hearings were one long nightmare. Jimmy Carter again gave us intelligence and honesty. I adored Jimmy Carter in his sweater, admonishing us to sacrifice a little, and I still adore him. I remembered Ronald Reagan from the movies, and found him an out-of-touch embarrassment. Remember David Stockman, trickle-down economics, closing mental institutions, and creating street people? Even George Bush I thought it was "voodoo," but Reagan was a Teflon president without compassion, a celebrity living in a quasi-fantasy world, ignoring the least among us, perpetuating the myth that the poor were poor because they chose poverty. I kept my head low and tried to forget who was president during those eight years. Reagan morphed into the weenie of Bush I, a privileged Kennebunkportian, out of touch with hoi polloi. Remember Bush's amazement at the supermarket scanners? Remember he hated broccoli? Did Bar make him eat it? The Bushes had no commitment to public service like the Kennedys. More dismantling of government.
I grew up loving the career civil service, public schools, public libraries, and the idea of everyone serving in the military. Those were great equalizers, in a Democratic country. When a politican says that government is not the solution, it's the problem, I cringe. Government is necessary for the good of its people. Ronn tells me: "The business of business is to make money. The job of government is to take some of that money, in the form of taxes, and use it for the benefit of all its citizens." We are now seeing the effects of the systematic dismantling of government functions and controls by thirty years of Republican effort. If we have a mercenary army, if we have Blackwater and war profiteers, I ask you: what motivation exists for peace?
I got excited again about Bill Clinton and Al Gore. Bill was a brilliant charmer, with a smart wife and a cadre of smart friends, and he got the government books in the black again. Wooden Al is animated on his topics. Davy Crockett said, "First be sure you're right, then go ahead." Carter and Gore have had the courage of their convictions, and have proven to be great humanitarians, and respected citizens of the world. What does it say about me that I fell in love with two Nobel Peace Prize winners in advance of their prizes?
Now Obama's words bring tears to my eyes. During the Bush II oilmen administration, an administration of an even more privileged Yalie, a clueless, lazy, and unworthy legacy and his vile (rearrange the letters to spell evil) vice-president, I have squirmed like a bug on a pin. How could we mortgage our future, and bankrupt the treasury? How could we preemptively invade and destroy a sovereign nation and sacrifice untold numbers of lives for oil and war profiteers? We have 6.7 billion people in the world, and hundreds of millions of people in the United States. Is this the best leadership we could come up with? We were scammed, big-time, by Bush and Co.
Finally, we have Barack Obama. Democrats seemed on the edge of extinction, but after the Republican fiascos, we roused a bit. Many good Democrats stepped up to the plate in the primary. They were all well-spoken (what a treat; remember how Bob Dole could hardly speak a coherent sentence, in fact spoke of himself in third person?). Kucinich made the most perfect sense, in a senseless world. Hillary showed her mettle and endurance. Now it's shaken out to Obama. Colin Powell has called Obama a "transformative figure." He has much to offer: education at the best schools (admitted on merit rather than connections), an admirably even temperament, curiosity, humility, empathy, energy, youth, fitness, a loving and exotic and international family. He is articulate and eloquent and grounded.
Obama seems not to be an egomaniac or a dissembler, but rather is a philosopher. He appreciates complexity, reality and wise advisors. I believe, I hope, he will pay attention to voices such those Al Gore, and James Hansen of NASA and all the other scientists who have been petitioning him, and will bring science back from where it has been starved, ridiculed and disregarded. Unlike the small minds of McCain/Palin, I believe Obama understands the value of a planetarium projector, studies of grizzly bear DNA, and fruit fly research--the foundation of modern genetics. But it's much, much larger than that: We need science and education to help us creatively address energy issues, and the looming and almost unimaginable threats of global warming, resource depletion, and global warming.
Obama's books are clear, crisp, and clean--indications of clear thinking. He has demonstrated extraordinary "executive" ability in running his campaign. How lucky we are that he has come along at this time in our nation's history, and is willing and ready to serve us. Small and vicious people have done what they can to derail him, but his incredible gift to us at this critical time in the history of our nation and the world is becoming clear to the majority of voters. The election of Obama will enhance our standing in the world, and our ability to communicate globally, like nothing else might.
Obama and his helpers have ginormous mess to deal with on many fronts, and I will be glad when the election is final, and I can leave a president #44 to it, a civil servant (I love those two words) rather than a businessman, and turn my attention to how I can serve locally.